I am
glad I could meet Swami Samagrananda last Sunday.
It
was the only time I could detect in his face, a very slight trace of the pains
he must have been going through.
I
have not interacted much with my Guru Swami Vireswarananda ji. It hurts
sometimes as it would hurt a boy who loses his father in his infancy. I had good
compensation when I had the holy company of Swami Bhuteshananda ji, but still
it sometimes rankled that it was not personal or personally intimate
companionship. To a good extent, my close interactions with Swami Vipapmananda
ji assuaged me a lot and to some extent my companionship with Swami
Tapasyananda and Swami Ranganathananda too helped. These greats passed away and
then it so happened that I started having frequent interactions with Swami
Samagrananda ji in the recent past.
This
time the relationship was in a different gear as I was slowly becoming a senior
monk of the Order and he was sliding into the group of great Veterans. I was
always into the habit of proffering advice, very often insistently and
pro-actively, to all folks, sought or unsought but in Swami Samagrananda I met
a dead end. He had the kindest of all faces I had ever seen and most courteous
in manners and speech and it was very difficult to whip up from within me any
willful assertiveness. I wanted to put up a good part of the blame for his inability to lie down in his bed and his spending his
last few months sitting in a somewhat
reclining chair on his perceived physical laziness and I could do it only in a round-about way, saying that his
living in good health for as long as possible will do a lot of good to the
Sangha and he from his part should do whatever it takes. He just replied in his
supremely pleasant way that it all depends on Thakur.
His
pleasant face and manners was his radiant hallmark. It was always possible to
pick holes in his decisions. It was easy to label him as somewhat lazy. Nevertheless,
his pleasantness and peacefulness prevailed over everything. Unto the very last,
he exuded peace, almost physically, so to say. One clearly understood what it
is to meet a sadhu. Some could whip up others into action. Some could make depressed
people cheerful again. Swami Samagrananda filled people with a sure and silent
peace. Devotees in Sri Lanka, where he lived for thirteen years, would remark
about his Buddha like calm face.
Haripad
Ramakrishna Math lays claim to being the first Kshetra of Sri Ramakrishna in
Kerala and rightfully so. But Tiruvalla too can lay a claim to be the first
centre because it was in Tiruvalla, in a land provided by Swami Samagrananda’s
father that the foundation stone to Tiruvalla Centre was laid by Swami
Nirmalananda a month before foundation to Haripad centre was laid. That was in
1912 long before Samagranananda ji was born in 1930.
There
is an incident that happened sometime in 1929-30. There was a little festival
in Tiruvalla connected with Ramakrishna Math and a certain number of people had
taken Prasad. Swami Nirmalananda asked the devotees how many fortunate people
had Prasad that day and they mentioned a number. Swami Nirmalananda asked if
they had counted correctly and they replied, yes, they had. Then Tulasi Maharaj
said they had missed out one person. When they asked who was that fortunate
soul, Nirmalananda ji replied that it was the foetus inside such and such lady.
That was the mother of future Swami Samagrananda and she was in the family way.
There
is another incident involving the young boy who was to become Swami
Samagrananda later. It was a few years later and the boy was about five years
or older. Swami Nirmalananda was having his dinner and the boy kept looking at
his plate. The Swami too looked at him kindly. Then, suddenly the boy made a dash,
picked up a piece of Pappad from the Swami’s plate, and ran away. His mother
ran after him and scolded him. Tulasi Maharaj told the mother not to scold her
boy and said that her boy would be a Sannyasin and made a gesture of blessing to
the boy. Swami Samagrananda himself confirmed the truth of the story to me
about two years back and insisted on the fact that he had not stolen the pappad
but that the boy and the Swami both had an unspoken understanding that it is ok
for the boy to have this Prasad.